Search results for "credibility evaluation"

showing 4 items of 4 documents

Student evaluations of the credibility and argumentation of online sources

2021

This study investigated upper secondary school students’ skills in evaluating the credibility and argumentative content of a blog text and a YouTube video. Both sources concerned child vaccination, the blog text opposing and the YouTube video supporting it. Students rated each source as credible, fairly credible or non-credible, justified their ratings, and analyzed the argumentation of both sources. Their justifications were analyzed for trustworthiness and expertise and their argument analyses for identification of the main position of the source and the reasons supporting it. Students’ justification skills proved fairly weak, and they also struggled with recognizing unbalanced argumentat…

Argumentativelähdekritiikkionline sources050105 experimental psychologyEducationMultimodalityArgumentation theoryCritical literacylukiolaisetcritical literacyargumentationCredibilityMathematics educationComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesmedialukutaitoverkkoaineistomultimodalitymultimodaalisuusSecondary levelcredibility evaluation05 social sciences050301 educationlukioupper secondary schoolargumentointiPsychology0503 education
researchProduct

Examining the structure of credibility evaluation when sixth graders read online texts

2023

Background Previous research indicates that students lack sufficient online credibility evaluation skills. However, the results are fragmented and difficult to compare as they are based on different types of measures and indicators. Consequently, there is no clear understanding of the structure of credibility evaluation. Objectives The present study sought to establish the structure of credibility evaluation of online texts among 265 sixth graders. Methods Students' credibility evaluation skills were measured with a task in which they read four online texts, two more credible (a popular science text and a newspaper article) and two less credible (a layperson's blog text and a commercial tex…

Internetcredibility evaluationnuoretinformaatiolukutaito516 Educational sciencessourcingadolescentsinformation literacyuskottavuusComputer Science ApplicationsEducationtiedonhankinta
researchProduct

Students' abilities to evaluate the credibility of online texts: The role of internet‐specific epistemic justifications

2021

Previous evaluation studies have rarely used authentic online texts and investigated upper secondary school students' use of evaluation criteria and deep reasoning. The associations between internet-specific epistemic justifications for knowing and credibility evaluation of online texts are not yet fully understood among adolescents. This study investigated upper secondary school students' (N = 372) abilities to evaluate self-selected authentic online texts and the role of internet-specific epistemic justifications in students' evaluation performance when solving a health-related information problem. Students selected three texts with Google Custom Search Engine and evaluated their credibil…

justifications forknowingInternetcredibility evaluationperustelutbusiness.industrylähdekritiikkisourcingonline inquiryComputer Science ApplicationsEducationEpistemologynuoretinformaatiolukutaitoCredibilityComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION516 Educational sciencesThe InternetadolescentsuskottavuusmedialukutaitoverkkoaineistobusinessPsychologyarviointiinternet-specific epistemic justificationsJournal of Computer Assisted Learning
researchProduct

Sixth graders evaluating online texts : self-efficacy beliefs predict confirming but not questioning the credibility

2023

This study investigated how sixth graders’ credibility evaluation self-efficacy was associated with their ability to evaluate the credibility of online texts. Students (N = 265, Mage = 12.45) worked in a web-based environment, where they read and evaluated two more credible texts and two less credible texts that required confirming and questioning the texts’ credibility, respectively. Students were asked to evaluate the author’s expertise, the author’s benevolence, and the quality of evidence in each text. They were also asked to assess their credibility evaluation self-efficacy during the task. The structural equation model indicated that students’ self-efficacy was positively associated w…

online evaluationminäpystyvyyscredibility evaluationmonilukutaitodigital literacieslukutaitouskottavuusprimary school studentsself-efficacyarviointi
researchProduct